Imagine a compliance platform costs $12,000 per year. Is that expensive?
The answer is dependent on what it is replacing.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection across a complicated technology environment, $12,000 could be well-spent. If a small business of seven people could collect the same information manually in a few hours each month, the calculation appears to be quite different.
It’s a great way to start your search for Vanta. Identifying the platform with the best features is not the first step. Determine how much time and effort those features will save your company.
Automated Manufacturing Has an Break-Even Point
It’s not inherently good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance changes as the company grows. Imagine a company growing in technology with hundreds of employees, numerous cloud environments, multiple applications, and regular access changes. The manual process of collecting evidence can become a major administrative burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence can easily justify the cost.
Imagine a startup of 10 people getting ready to go through the first SOC 2. audit. It may have a relatively smaller infrastructure, and the collection of evidence could be managed with no significant automation.
Vanta pricing is based upon this difference. A sophisticated platform can provide significant capabilities, however those capabilities deliver financial value only when an organization actually requires the capabilities.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta and Drata quickly turns into a feature-by -feature exercise. It is crucial to evaluate the features, services contract and quotes offered by each platform. Both are well-established compliance platforms that focus on integrations and automation.
Another decision needs to be made before that. Do you require a Compliance platform that integrates? Certain businesses would prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence collection. Others prefer to provide their own evidence, especially when their workload is small.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Use the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. On the market, there are also platforms that have a more minimalist design which are focused more on the organization of systems rather and connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors, compliance consultants, and other professionals, organizes control frameworks within a central workspace. It provides editable policies and guidelines for the auditing process, and allows auditors to examine evidence with read-only access.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers upload and choose the documents they would like to share.
Access to the Factor System into the Decision
The elimination of integrations does not come without its limitations: one must manually gather evidence.
This removes the requirement to integrate, and the process of compliance is not dependent on an integration with the operational environment.
The architectures are not universally superior. Which one is appropriate for your company?
CertAssist aims at teams that have between five and 200 employees and gives pricing information rather than having to have an in-person sales meeting. The initial price listed for CertAssist is $225 monthly rather than a regular $375.
Let Complexity Have Its Place
The needs of a 10-person company today may not be its needs when it has 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can make sense. As systems, employees, frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the financials could ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity take its place when you purchase compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty different integrations because they look impressive on the comparison chart. They’re worth the cost as the work they replace is more expensive than performing them manually.